Derek W. Freihaut
Laura A. Maxwell
Christina L. Negley
Arthur R. Randolph II
Robert J. Walling III
Erich A. Brandt
Jordan R. Paszek
Timothy C. Mosler
Nicholas E. Alicea
Joseph A. Herbers
Aaron N. Hillebrandt
Darcie R. Truttmann
Knowledge of construction industry (roofing contractors) provided additional insight I was looking for in the actuarial review. The breadth of knowledge was just what I was looking for.
Pinnacle helps alternative market risk owners, captive managers and service providers determine risk retentions that optimize the balance between the cost of risk transfer and loss volatility.
Pinnacle has consultants who are experienced as expert witnesses in arbitrations and also ARIAS-certified arbitrators.
Pinnacle consultants deal with auditors daily, assisting them in serving their customers and evaluating the work products of other actuaries.
Pinnacle strives to construct benchmarks for any analysis, whether ratemaking, loss reserving or some other use, as close as possible to replicating the nature of the underlying data being reviewed.
Pinnacle can assist you in controlling your property
catastrophe exposure by determining the impact of policy changes, including
deductibles, or reviewing geographic areas where exposures are driving your
Self-insurance programs, which allow companies to pay some portion of their insurable loss exposures, come in all shapes, sizes and types. Multinational corporations, single state operations, large deductible and retrospectively rated policies, risk retention groups (RRGs), and captives — including 831(b)s, single parent captives, segregated cells, and group captives — all play critical roles.
As nationally-respected experts in alternative markets, Pinnacle provides a full range of actuarial services to a wide variety of self-insureds, including traditional loss reserve analysis for exposure within deductibles or self-insured retentions. We can compare alternate program structures, analyze retention levels and develop feasibility study documents, along with a wide range of other services.
Our expertise comes from having a team of experienced consultants with deep understanding of the challenges self insureds face, but also with the local knowledge unique to individual market segments, such as:
As well, we are well versed in the intricacies of mechanisms for alternative markets structures, including:
May 14 2020 APEX
Actuarial 101 for Self-Insured Entities
Authored by Ken J. Hawkins.
April 2018 APEX Webinar
Actuarial 101 for Self-Insured Entities
Authored by Nicholas E. Alicea.
See More »
Captive Dividend Assessment
An onshore, single parent captive was concerned with the amount of retained earnings and wanted to establish a policy for the minimum capital for the program to trigger dividend distributions. Pinnacle compared the program’s capitalization to a wide variety of industry standards for similar programs from rating agencies, regulators, and other sources. The results of this analysis lead to a recommended board policy regarding a minimum capital threshold for dividend distributions and ultimately to a significant dividend being declared to the parent company.
Pinnacle serves many of the largest group captives in the world, many of them domiciled in the Cayman Islands. These reserve analyses are typically produced twice a year and serve multiple purposes. First, they provide a range of reasonable estimates which management uses to determine their best estimate of ultimate losses and unpaid claims liabilities. Second, these reserve estimates can then be allocated to individual members to determine the outstanding liabilities and potential future assessments, if any. Finally, the allocated ultimate losses become the basis for renewal pricing estimates for each member. Pinnacle’s approach to estimating and allocating reserves in group captives is unique in the industry and sets our alternative practice apart with its efficiency and accuracy.
Pinnacle was asked by a large self-insured regional transportation authority to assess the impact of increasing their self-insured retentions for both workers compensation and automobile liability. We developed a stochastic simulation analysis, based on the program’s historical claims experience and industry benchmarks, that examined not only the increase in expected losses but the program’s additional potential loss variability. Finally, we discussed with the customer the relationship between their current capital position, as well as the current reinsurance market, to ensure the retention they selected for their program was appropriate for them. The authority ultimately increased their retentions, put some of their excess capital to work, and realized substantial savings in their reinsurance costs.
At Pinnacle, we partner with you to explore whatever path it takes to find the answers you need.
December 16, 2021
December APEX Webinar -
ASOPs: Practice Makes Perfect