Derek W. Freihaut
Robert J. Walling III
Joseph A. Herbers
Linda K. Brobeck
Timothy C. Mosler
Aaron N. Hillebrandt
Roosevelt C. Mosley Jr.
Arthur R. Randolph II
Laura A. Maxwell
Christina L. Negley
I have worked with Pinnacle on previous occasions and their work and information has always been top notch.
Pinnacle has compiled relevant databases for use as
the basis for legislative costing analyses and other studies.
Pinnacle provides costing and impact analysis of
proposed legislative changes and also provides written and oral testimony in
support of our analyses.
Pinnacle’s team of experienced experts can provide
expertise to help craft and quantify the impact of solutions for issues
affecting the insurance market in today’s rapidly changing environment.
Pinnacle has experience not only determining the cost
of potential legislative changes, but also assessing their impact on affected
segments and stakeholders.
Pinnacle excels in providing expected changes in
insurance costs due to proposed legislation on behalf of state insurance
regulators, state legislative committees, insurance trade organizations, and
state associations of physicians, hospitals and trial lawyers.
With insurance laws and regulations constantly evolving, being alert to changes and their implications is only part of your challenge. Since even a seemingly small modification can have a material impact, you need actuarial experts who can detect a potential law’s implications on insurance markets quickly and accurately.
Our experienced property/casualty actuaries can apply their expertise to help you understand the potential legislative impact in your state. Our costing studies of proposed insurance legislation help policy makers in many states sift through legislative implications. And, as you work to meet unrealistic deadlines in even more complicated political circumstances, we will make sure our analysis is both timely and easy to understand.
We are also available to provide both written and oral testimony to support our findings. As expert witnesses, our actuaries assist insurance trade organizations and state regulators, legislative committees and industry associations, including physician and hospital groups.
As innovators in the actuarial profession, we helped create the underwriting and pricing practices that are now industry standards. We remain on the cutting edge of actuarial science through our recognized commitment to the actuarial profession and thought leadership. We combine our deep expertise and insight gained from working with a wide range of clients with unique qualities that help us ensure we stand apart from other providers:
Independent. Solely-owned by our professional staff, Pinnacle is not affiliated with any insurance company or accounting firm. Pinnacle’s independence is demonstrated by the variety of clients who trust us for legislative support projects including: state insurance regulators, state legislative committees, insurance trade organizations, and state associations of physicians, hospitals, insurers and trial lawyers.
Credible. Our legislative support spans a variety of cases and venues. As recognized leaders in the actuarial profession, our legislative analyses are given the highest standard of credibility.
Experienced. Along with our seasoned actuaries, our team includes training actuaries who can provide a fresh perspective. We pull from our deep bench to assemble the right team for each assignment.
Pinnacle Commitment Beyond Numbers Brochure
Empathetic Customer Service, Superior Communication, Expertise, Better Business Decisions
Pinnacle Health Care Industry Brochure
Pinnacle’s experts understand the spectrum of risks inherent in delivering healthcare services in today’s litigious environment.
See More »
Colorado Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses
Pinnacle Actuarial Resources prepared an independent actuarial analysis on behalf of the Colorado Auto Insurance Working Group to determine the cost implications of changes to the Colorado no-fault law. One of the scenarios analyzed was the complete repeal of the no-fault law, replacing it with medical payments coverage.
The analysis employed data from a recent study by the Insurance Research Council (IRC) to assess the impact of a $2,500 economic loss threshold relative to BI losses. Loss and trend information from the Fast-Track monitoring system was reviewed to estimate the impact of implementing no-fault systems from other jurisdictions. Moreover, the Fast Track data was evaluated to assess the impact on costs of other jurisdictions that had previously repealed their no-fault systems.
Lastly, the indicated cost estimates for the state of Colorado were compared to those of tort states in order to assess the reasonableness of the study’s outcomes. The results from this study were used to support rate filings of several of our clients in support of the reforms.
Minnesota Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses
The Insurance Federation of Minnesota retained Pinnacle in 2006 to conduct an independent actuarial study to determine the possible cost implications of changing Minnesota’s current no-fault law. The scenarios were:
New Jersey Automobile No-Fault Impact Analyses
Save Choices for New Jersey Drivers (SCNJD), an ad-hoc coalition of insurers, trade and business associations asked Pinnacle to determine how proposed legislation would affect drivers.
The New Jersey Auto Cost Reduction Act eliminated the judicial requirement that permanent injuries that do not meet the other eligibility criteria for tort claims in no fault cases must have a “serious impact” on the claimant’s life. Pinnacle evaluated the affect of eliminating this requirement and determined the law would “significantly increase “losses eligible for tort recovery. Hence, Bodily Injury (BI) Liability and Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Coverage (UM/UIM) costs and premiums would increase for drivers selecting the verbal threshold.
On June 14, 2005, two years after Pinnacle conducted its analysis, the New Jersey Supreme Court concluded does not imply a "serious impact" requirement for those seeking damages for non-economic losses (Octavio Serrano v. Jacqueline Serrano, et al. (A-99-03) and DiProspero v. Penn, et al., (A-66-03). As a result, injured claimants may seek recompense from the at-fault party for losses such as pain and suffering. SCNJD hired Pinnacle again to update the analysis based upon the later Insurance Research Council (IRC) data, which became available subsequent to the release of its 2003 report.
At Pinnacle, we partner with you to explore whatever path it takes to find the answers you need.
October 21, 2020
November 19, 2020
November APEX Webinar -
State of the Florida Homeowners Market